|
|
|
Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes in Spain
Because of variations in age, risk factors, lifestyle, socioeconomic status, and disease presentation, the needs of individual patients must be considered in the treatment and management of diabetes, and strategies must be tailored to the specific patient. The primary objective of the treatment of both type 1 and 2
of diabetes is to prevent chronic complications and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with the disease.[1] Other objectives include improvement of acute symptoms and avoidance of hypoglycemic
episodes.[1] In patients with a longer life expectancy, strict regulation of blood glucose is necessary to reduce the chronic effects of hyperglycemia, though in patients with a limited life expectancy the
danger of hypoglycemia may outweigh the value of stricter control.[1]
Diet and exercise are essential elements of therapy, not only in order to maintain biochemical normality and to ensure good nutrition, but
also to maintain a normal weight and diminish the postprandial fluctuations of glycemia and risk of hypoglycemia.[1] The effective care of patients with diabetes in
general should take into consideration several particular targets such as glycemic control, lifestyle modification and maintenance, and control of
cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and lipid levels.
A full treatment and management plan for the person with
diabetes, whether type 1 or type 2, is comprised of at least 6 areas of focus.
According to the Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumption (Ministerio de Sanida
y Consumo), these include:[2]
- Dietary management: individualized to the necessities of
each person’s preferences, an effective diet must contemplate objectives
related to the attainment of an optimal weight, socioeconomic situation,
availabilities, and physical ability.[2]
- Physical activity plan: similar to dietary plan in the
need for individualization, preferences, objectives, and ability. The ideal is
to reach at least 30 minutes daily of active and preferably aerobic activity.[2]
- Medication: In addition to insulin, there are many
medications used in the treatment of diabetes, and the patient must be aware of
contraindications, interactions, the relation of the medication to food intake,
precautions with alcohol, etc. Most of the treatments for diabetes can cause
hypoglycemia, so patients must be aware of the warning signs.[2]
- Self-monitoring and regulation: All patients with diabetes
must be instructed in the basic techniques used to monitor and regulate their
disease; the modifications required during physical activity, dietary changes,
and illness; and the signs of glycemic irregularity.[2]
- Regular follow-up and evaluation: A fundamental part of
the treatment of diabetes is the regular checkup, not only in relation to the
performance of analytical tests that may affect treatment but also those that may
detect complications such as retinopathy, microalbuminuria, hypertension, and
evaluation of global cardiovascular risk.[2]
- General health behaviors: Most importantly, the patient
with diabetes should be advised to avoid smoking, which is an important
cardiovascular risk factor in all individuals but presents an increased risk in
the individual with diabetes. Also, developing habits that allow a regular and
ordered life, with schedules of regular meals and time for physical exercise,
is extremely advisable. Further, the care and hygiene of the feet and the skin
in general is of considerable importance to the patient with diabetes.[2]
Global efforts to prevent complications and
delay disease progression in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes have been
considerably influenced by two often-cited major clinical trials.[3],[4]
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) showed that intensive therapy improved glycemic control and slowed
the onset and progression of complications (diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy,
and neuropathy) in patients with type 1 diabetes.[3] Patients
received either conventional diabetes management or intensive insulin therapy. The
latter group also received education and extensive support to assist them in
achieving glycemic targets.[3]
However, the reduction in diabetic complications was diminished by as much as a
3-fold increase in severe hypoglycemia. In addition, the study’s design did not
allow for separation of the effects of education versus insulin therapy.[3] The United Kingdom
Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) examined the role of glycemic and
blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes.[3],[4]
In the glycemic control component of the study, the intensive control group (treated
with a sulfonylurea, insulin, or metformin) aimed for a fasting plasma glucose
(FPG) <6 mmol/L, whereas the conventional control group (treated primarily
with dietary modifications) aimed for an FPG of <15 mmol/L.[5] Similarly,
blood pressure was tightly maintained with captopril or atenolol and a target
of <150/85 mm Hg, or less tightly controlled without ACE inhibitors or
β blockers and a target of <180/105 mm Hg.[4],[5] Intensive glycemic
control reduced the risk of major diabetic eye disease by 25% and early kidney
damage by 33%, and tighter blood pressure control reduced the risk of death
from long-term complications of diabetes by up to 33%, strokes by more than 44%, and
serious deterioration of vision by more than 47%.[4],[5] Several key points regarding
the management of diabetes and hypertension can be extrapolated from the UKPDS:
- Diabetes progressed despite clinical management. Even with intensive initial treatment with insulin or a sulfonylurea, most patients require a combination of oral antidiabetic agents and/or insulin to optimize glycemic control[3]
- Intensive treatment with sulfonylureas or insulin carries a risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain[3]
- First-line use of metformin in overweight patients may reduce complications and death without causing significant weight gain, and reduces cardiovascular events. This effect was not seen when metformin was added to maximal dose sulfonylurea[3]
- Multiple drugs may be required to optimize blood pressure control. Three or more drugs were needed by 29% of the tightly controlled group, and only 56% of patients in the tightly controlled group attained the target blood pressure[3]
- Blood pressure level attained appears to be more important than the type of drug used[3]
Given the results of these and numerous
other studies, Sociedad Española de Diabetes (SED) guidelines, as well as regional
guidelines, all stress the importance of focusing on glycemic control and cardiovascular
risk factors in the treatment and management of patients with diabetes in order
to delay progression of disease and prevent the development of associated
complications.[2],[6] Measurement of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) has been shown to be an
effective indicator of average glycemia over the previous 60-day period, and
both the UKPDS and the DCCT have demonstrated the importance of controlling
blood glucose levels by targeting A1C levels for people with both type 1 and
type 2 diabetes.
Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes
Insulin delivery methods, frequency of injections, insulin pharmacological profile, patient compliance, target
control, severity of disease, and risk factors for complications and hypoglycemic episodes should be foremost in the mind of the clinician when
managing patients with type 1 diabetes. Further, treatment regimens continue to evolve, potentially increasing in effectiveness and convenience as emerging
forms of insulin; new and improved insulin delivery methods such as pumps, pens and inhaled forms; blood glucose monitoring technology; and procedures such as
solid pancreas and islet cell transplantation are developed and improved.
In patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin
therapy is initiated at diagnosis, accompanied by diabetic education (eg, diet,
exercise, self-monitoring, self-administration of insulin) whether as an
outpatient or as an inpatient in the case of ketoacidosis or other adverse
condition[7] Currently, most insulins used in Spain are recombinant forms, having displaced those of
animal origin, and are categorized typically based on onset and duration of
action into short-acting, intermediate-acting, and long-acting, as well as premixed
insulins.[7] There are 3 main insulin
delivery systems in use in Spain at present. These are:
- Insulin syringes: the classic needle delivery, currently
used with 40UI/mL concentration[7]
- Insulin pens: Automated
mechanisms with replaceable insulin cartridges that work with 100 UI/mL
concentration insulin[7]
- Preloaded syringes: Like the pen, these syringes come
preloaded, are disposable, and are used with 100UI/mL insulin[7]
Table 1. Illustrates the various types of insulins and
delivery systems generally used in Spain.
Table 1. Insulins avaiable in Spain[7]
|
Generic Group |
Profile of
Action
|
Commercially Available Version |
|
Onset of action |
Maximum action |
Duration of action |
U40 |
U100 |
|
Fast |
15-30 minutes |
2-4 hours |
5-7 hours |
Actrapid HM |
Penfill Novopen
|
|
Novolet Actrapid |
|
Humulina regular |
BDPen+cartuchos* |
|
Humaplus regular† |
|
Intermediate (NPH) |
1-2 hours |
4-8 hours |
14-18 hours |
Insulatard NPH |
Penfill Novopen* |
|
Novolet Insulatard† |
|
Humulina NPH |
BDPen+cartuchos* |
|
Humaplus NPH† |
|
2 -3 hours |
7-12 hours |
16-20 hours |
Monotard HM |
n/a |
|
Mixtures |
According to proportion |
Mixtard 30 HM |
Mixtard-x Novolet† |
|
Slow/Long-Acting |
2-3 hours |
4-16 hours |
18-24 hours |
Humulina x:y |
No U100 for this group |
|
Humulina lenta |
|
4-6 hours |
10-20 hours |
26-28 hours |
Ultratard |
|
3-4 hours |
6-14 hours |
26 hours |
Humulina-Ultralenta |
|
Lispro analog |
15 minutes |
30-60 minutes |
4-5 hours |
Humalog |
BDPen+cartuchos* |
*Cartridges for injector pen
†Preloaded syringe
Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
The primary objectives in the treatment of
type 2 diabetes are similar to those for type 1; according to the SED
guidelines, these include:[8]
- Normalization of glycemia[8]
- Reduction/elimination of symptoms related to hyperglycemia[8]
- Avoidance of acute glycemic fluctuations[8]
- Avoidance or delay of the appearance or progression of chronic
complications such as:
o
Microvascular complications: diabetic retinopathy,
diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy[8]
o
Macrovascular complications: ischemic cardiopathy,
cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease[8]
- Reduction of mortality[8]
- Maintenance of quality of life[8]
Dietary and lifestyle modifications are the
initial treatment for patients with less severe type 2 diabetes.[7] Pharmacological intervention with metformin,
sulfonylureas (SUs), α-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs), thiazolidinediones
(TZDs), insulin therapy, or combinations of these medications are indicated in
more severe or chronically uncontrolled patients or if no improvement is seen
in 3-6 months.[7] Stricter
therapeutic objectives should be observed in younger patients to avoid the
development of chronic complications of hyperglycemia, and in older and frailer
patients, for whom the dangers of hypoglycemia are more pronounced.[1]
According to one 2004 study, about 25% of patients with diabetes in Spain are treated with diet alone.[9] The study looked at differences in treatment regimens during a 1-year period in
294 practices throughout the EU, and found the following patterns in the treatment and management of patients in Spain (Table 2). These patient groups, however, include both type 1 and type 2,
though it may be assumed that no type 1 patients fall into the “diet alone”category.
Table 2. Diabetes treatment patterns in Spanish primary care practices (2004)[9]
|
Age |
Diet only (%) |
Oral
antidiabetics and diet (%) |
Oral antidiabetics,
insulin and diet (%) |
Insulin and diet (%) |
Total patients |
|
0-44 years |
18.3 |
20.0 |
3.8 |
58.0 |
345 |
|
>44 years |
25.4 |
55.2 |
3.4 |
16.0 |
6881 |
|
All ages |
25.1 |
53.5 |
3.4 |
18.0 |
7226 |
Oral antidiabetic agents currently in
general use in Spain include:[3],[6]
o
Clorpropamide
o
Glibenclamide
o
Gliclazide
o
Glimepiride
o
Glipizide
o
Gliquidone
o
Glisentide
o
Tolbutamide
o
Metformin
o
Repaglinide
o
Nateglinide
o
Acarbose
o
Miglitol
o
Rosiglitazone
o
Pioglitazone
The following general guidelines are suggested when combining
oral antidiabetic agents:[7]
- Two SUs are contraindicated[7]
- SUs + Acarbose: may be useful in controlling postprandial
hyperglycemia[7]
- Metformin + SU: may be useful when patient fails the maximum
dosage of metformin, only when there are no contraindications to both drugs[7]
- Metformin + acarbosa: insufficient evidence for this combination[7]
Clinicians should be guided by patient needs and accepted
guidelines, such as the SED guidelines, when combining oral therapeutic agents,
and when adding insulin to an oral regimen[7]
References
- http://www.icf.uab.es/a_primaria/Capituls-Index-Cas/capi9cas.pdf. Accessed May 2006.
- www.msc.es/en/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enfNoTransmisibles/diabetes/diabetes.htm#prevencion. Accessed May 2006.
- British Medical Association. Diabetes mellitus: an update for professionals. Available at: http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/Diabetes/$file/diabetes.pdf. Accessed March 2006.
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study. Available at: http://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/index.html?maindoc=/ukpds/. Accessed March 2006.
- NHS MeReC briefing. Type 2 diabetes (part 1):the management of blood glucose. Available at: http://www.npc.co.uk/MeReC_Briefings/2003/Briefing%20No%2025%20press%20RGB.pdf. Accessed: February 2006
- http://www.feaed.org/biblioteca/documentos/andalucia/Mellitus_1.pdf. Accessed March 2006.
- http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/sanidad/scs/6/6_1/cardiovascular/diabetes/dbtes_tratamiento.jsp.
- www.sediabetes.org/grupos_trabajo/doc_diabetes_tipo2_1.pdf. Accessed May 2006.
- Donker G, et al. Differences in treatment regimes,consultation frequency and referral patterns of diabetes mellitus in general practice in five European countries. Family Practice. 2004;21:362-369.
|
|